What were our founding fathers thinking when allowing the establishment of A PANEL OF NINE, to preside over conflicts, disputes and events threatening the perceived fabric of our Nation? Sitting in lofty heights, untouchable by those presenting their side of the story, these NINE seem above the fray, able to speak from personal biased experience, expounding upon the facts as they choose to see them, and often lecturing as though they are the teachers and all who are before them are only simple students, having to listen, and being swayed to abide by the decisions and dictates of the NINE. How often we have desired to bring our cases before them, but alas, they only choose to hear the subjects they find worthy of their attention, in order to pursue their agenda, and resolve issues they deem most important. These appointed NINE supposedly come from different backgrounds, having a variety of differing ideologies. However, it has become highly evident that the majority of the NINE often have a singularity of purpose. Even though a variety of ethnicities and genders serve on this esteemed PANEL OF NINE, it would seem that from recent renderings and releases, this PANEL OF NINE has only one conclusion that will be released.
When was it determined that A PANEL OF NINE was the best possible combination of personalities? Is it best to ensure equitable outcomes of decisions by seeing to a balance of ideologies, while maintaining cultural diversity? How is this to be done when an uneven number on A PANEL OF NINE exists? Can and should we always allow one individual to be the only one who can appoint to A PANEL OF NINE? Can we trust this one individual to make the right choices in appointments, without apparent bias and obvious weighting personal desires in selection of candidates to serve on A PANEL OF NINE? Can we be assured that those who serve on A PANEL OF NINE will always ask the right questions, probe the depths of the issues at hand, and explore all aspects that pertain to the subject at hand ensuring a just and legal outcome that abides by precedent and established law previously set forth? Will the outcomes of decisions made by A PANEL OF NINE withstand the test of time, without the need for appeal or revisitation through another challenge or action? Will all citizens agree with the decision made by A PANEL OF NINE without dispute, without concern for process or procedure, and will all citizens submit willingly and without dispute to the decisions rendered by A PANEL OF NINE? Is it even possible for A PANEL OF NINE to render an incorrect decision, and if this rare occurrence was to happen, what, if any, process or procedure can be implemented to rectify and make whole the wrong that was committed? If an incorrect decision was ever to become apparent, what should be the consequence imposed upon A PANEL OF NINE?
There may be those of you out there that think we have lost our marbles, that we have rejected the founding principles of FREEDOM and LIBERTY upon which our great Nation was founded? But lest you leave this blog with the wrong impression, let’s just say maybe in reading this blog you have drawn the wrong impression. Is it ironic to some degree that the Supreme Court of the United States is not the only deliberative body consisting of A PANEL OF NINE? Did you believe we were talking about the highest court in our land? The Supreme Court of the United States is not the only deliberative body consisting of A PANEL OF NINE. Can you think of another? If not, let us give you a pretty big hint. The Select Committee of the January 6th Commission it, too, is A PANEL OF NINE, set up as their own little supreme court. It was established in conflict with set guidance, precedence and rules. However, it should have been a panel of thirteen as specified by resolution (pointoforder.com, January 22, 2022). It was, and is, unbalanced, biased, and established with a pre-established conclusion. The leader of the House did not appoint any of the five members recommended by the minority House leader (pointoforder.com, January 22, 2022; CRS Rep., The Committee System in the U.S. Congress 2 – October 14, 2009: “Each party is primarily responsible for choosing its committee leaders and assigning its Members to committees . . . “). Subpoenas have been issued, but since the committee is in violation of Section 2(a) of the authorizing resolution, those subpoenas are in fact invalid. (pointoforder.com, January 22, 2022). Since when has doing things against the established legal precedence ever been an obstacle for those who will use whatever means necessary to achieve their goals? The committee has also been found altering evidence and lying about it (pjmedia.com, June 12, 2022). There have been no counter witnesses or arguments allowed (foxnews.com, June 10, 2022; cnsnews.com, June 13, 2022). Those who instituted A PANEL OF NINE have done so without regard to legal foundations, and have avoided asking the more important questions that needed exploration about the event on January 6, 2021. Questions like how many FBI and other informants were actively involved in the lead-up to, and during, the event? Why did the leader of the House and the local mayor reject additional law enforcement protection, even though proposed by the White House days before? Why was an unarmed civilian shot dead, with no unbiased investigation into the individual who perpetrated such act? Why were weeks of warnings about the unpreparedness of the Capital Police ignored? Why were many protestors escorted into the building through opened doors and not stopped? Why are many still incarcerated and being prosecuted today for simple misdemeanors, when violent offenders committing murders and other atrocities (BLM/Antifa mobsters who rioted for months) are allowed bail and even lessor penalties (Townhall.com, January 6, 2022)? Why have the thousands of hours of video tape not been release to the general public? Finally, A PANEL OF NINE is projected to spend 8 million during its tenure (Breitbart.com, June 9, 2022). How would you have chosen to spend 8 million of your tax payer dollars?
It is evident that A PANEL OF NINE has only one purpose, and that is to prevent the former President of the United States from ever running for that position again. This is just another attempt to protect the political and financial power brokers who have taken over the center of our government. Perhaps they have forgotten that Congress serves us. That our rights to FREEDOM and LIBERTY in our Nation are given to us by God, not by a burdensome, authoritarian, dictatorial centralized government. Our forefathers fought against this generations ago and won. Now is not the time to lay down our defenses and yield our FREEDOM and LIBERTY for which so many have died to obtain and retain.